Ideas framed as tools
“We need a chatbot” names a technology, not a job. Without the task, its volume and the person who does it today, nobody can size the benefit or the build.
AI consulting and strategy
A fixed-scope engagement for teams with more AI ideas than evidence. We turn each idea into a task that can be measured, check it against your data and systems, try the strongest on real samples, and sequence the ones worth doing into a roadmap with build and running costs attached.
Why AI ideas stay ideas
The gap between “we should use AI for this” and a project someone can scope and price is where most organisations get stuck. It usually comes down to one of four things.
What you can decide at the end
The engagement is built around decisions your leadership team can take straight away:
“We need a chatbot” names a technology, not a job. Without the task, its volume and the person who does it today, nobody can size the benefit or the build.
Nobody has run the idea against twenty real emails, forms or documents. The first real test ends up being a full build, which is the most expensive way to find out.
Model fees, review time, monitoring and support only show up after launch — sometimes turning a sound idea into one that costs more than the work it saves.
Three teams each commission their own AI tool, each with its own data access and search. Nothing is sequenced, and the same groundwork is paid for three times.
What the engagement covers
Each piece produces something written that your team keeps. Together they answer the question most AI plans skip: can this work here, on this data, at this cost?
Video interviews with the people who do the work, screen-share walk-throughs of the process, and volumes from your systems. Every idea is written as a task with a volume, a time cost and an owner.
The two or three strongest candidates tried on anonymised samples of real inputs with off-the-shelf models, to see how often the output is good enough and where it fails.
Where the inputs live, how complete and current they are, whether the systems holding them have usable APIs, and which personal data each idea would touch.
A feature in software you already pay for, a specialist product, or a custom build — compared on the same terms: cost, fit, data handling and how hard it is to leave.
The shortlisted use cases in a sensible order, with dependencies and shared groundwork shown, a cost range to build and to run for each, and the measure that defines success.
For each use case: the personal data involved, where a person must approve the output, what should be logged, and the questions to ask any vendor. Your DPO and IT team decide.
How we work
The seven stages we use on every project, applied to advice: ideas are gathered broadly, narrowed on evidence, and the strongest tried on real samples before anything goes into the roadmap.
We collect ideas from each team over video calls and a shared channel, then measure the current process behind each one: how often it happens, how long it takes and what goes wrong.
Candidate use cases, each written as a task
Ideas are scored on benefit, effort, data readiness and risk. The strongest few move on, each with a note on what we need to test and which samples we need to test it.
A shortlist and a test plan
For each shortlisted idea we sketch where the AI would sit in the day’s work — who sees its output, who approves it — and map the data it would need to reach.
Working sketches and data maps
Short feasibility spikes on anonymised samples: hosted or open models, retrieval or classic machine learning, whichever each idea calls for. Spikes are for evidence and never go into production.
Spike results for each candidate
The people who do the work today review the spike output with us, and every error is sorted into fixable, tolerable with review, or a reason to stop.
Reviewed results and error analysis
We walk your leadership team through the roadmap on a video call, with the spike results on screen and the reasoning for every build, buy and drop decision written down.
A costed roadmap and a decision
We can help scope the first build, review other suppliers’ proposals against the roadmap, or rerun the ranking when models, prices or priorities change.
Help with the route you choose
Technology
Feasibility spikes use the same tools we build with, kept deliberately light: enough to produce evidence on real samples, not a hidden first version of the product.
Hosted models
Open models
Classic machine learning
Retrieval
Spike tooling
Assessment
Model fees during spikes are paid to the provider and agreed with you in advance. Where samples contain personal data, we anonymise them or work inside your own environment.
Use cases
The common thread: a decision about AI that someone has to make, and not enough evidence to make it well.
Requests from finance, service and sales that cannot all be funded. A like-for-like comparison shows which one to start with, and which can share groundwork later.
Customers are asking for AI in the product. We test the candidate features on real customer data and cost them per user before any go on the roadmap.
A proof of concept that impressed but never went live. We look at how it was evaluated, what it costs to run and what is actually blocking it.
A supplier says their product will handle the work. A short spike on your own samples shows how it copes before you sign a multi-year contract.
Each use case described with its data flows, human approval points and logging, so compliance and your DPO can judge it rather than block it by default.
Some problems need a language model; many are really forecasting or scoring problems where classic machine learning is cheaper and easier to explain.
Why Techsleight
No inflated numbers — just how we run projects, and what you can hold us to.
We ask what the software is for before we estimate it — and we will tell you when something should not be built, or should be bought instead.
LLM features, retrieval and automation built with evaluation, guardrails and cost controls, and plain software where that is the better answer.
Design, frontend, backend, mobile, cloud and QA in one team, so nothing falls between suppliers.
UK business hours, estimates in pounds, and a contract with a UK company. Our engineers are based in the UK and India.
A fixed-scope project, dedicated developers or a monthly retainer — and you can move between them as the work changes.
Code, IP, cloud accounts and documentation are yours from day one. We sign an NDA before discovery if you need one.
We stay on for fixes, upgrades and new features, or hand over cleanly to your in-house team with the documentation to match.
FAQs
Straight answers on scope, cost, timelines and how we work. If yours is not here, ask us directly.
Teams that have several possible AI projects and need to choose between them on evidence: operations and product leaders, CTOs, and founders deciding which AI feature comes first. If you already know exactly what to build, you may be better starting with a scoped pilot or an AI MVP.
A short, throwaway test of one idea on a sample of your real inputs, using off-the-shelf models. It answers practical questions — how often is the output good enough, where does it fail, what would each task cost — before anyone commits to a build. Spikes produce evidence, not production software.
A focused engagement runs as a discovery sprint, from £2,000 as a fixed fee agreed before we start. Model fees for the feasibility spikes are paid to the provider and agreed with you in advance. Wider reviews across several departments are quoted as a fixed-price project.
We gather as many ideas as your teams have, and score them all on paper. Only the strongest two or three go through feasibility spikes, because testing on real samples is where the time goes — and where the useful evidence comes from.
A sponsor who can make the final decision, the people who do each shortlisted task today, and someone who knows the systems and data involved. We work remotely, over video calls and a shared channel, with weekly written updates during UK business hours.
By the shape of the task. Reading, drafting and answering questions from text suit language models; predicting a number or a risk from historical records usually suits classic machine learning; fixed, well-understood logic suits plain rules. Many good solutions combine them, and the spikes show which works on your data.
The shortlisted use cases in order, with the reasoning for that order; the shared groundwork, such as data access or search, that several use cases depend on; a cost range to build and to run each one; the measure that defines success; and the people who need to sign off.
Yes. For a pilot, we look at how it was tested, what it costs to run and what is stopping it going live. For a supplier’s proposal, we test the key claims on a sample of your own data where possible and set out the questions to ask before you sign.
Then that is the recommendation, with the reasons written down. A clear “not yet” or “buy this instead” saves far more than it costs. Often the better first step turns out to be a process fix, a report or a simple automation, and we will say so.
It flags what your advisers need to look at: personal data in each use case, where a person must approve decisions about individuals, and what should be logged. UK GDPR and ICO guidance apply to most use cases involving personal data, and the EU AI Act may apply if you sell into the EU. Your DPO and legal team make the call — we do not give legal advice.
Start a project
Tell us which ideas are on the table and who is asking for them. We will suggest how to narrow the list, what we would test on real samples, and what the engagement would cost.
What happens next
Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy.
Explore