Scores nobody can explain
A fraud or risk score without reasons is hard for an analyst to act on, and harder to defend to a customer, an auditor or the Financial Ombudsman Service.
AI by industry · Fintech and banking
Document AI for KYC and KYB packs, machine learning on fraud and transaction signals, and assistants that answer from approved content — each matched to the job, measured on your own historical cases and designed so an analyst makes the call.
Why finance AI stalls
Fintech AI projects rarely fail on accuracy alone. They stall when nobody can explain an output, when labelled data is thin, or when the model’s job overlaps a decision the firm has to own.
Where AI earns its place in finance
The dependable wins come from preparing work for a person, not replacing their judgement:
A fraud or risk score without reasons is hard for an analyst to act on, and harder to defend to a customer, an auditor or the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Confirmed fraud is rare and often labelled weeks later, so a model trained naively learns the ordinary case and misses the pattern that matters.
Fraudsters adapt, products change and spending shifts with the economy. A model nobody monitors for drift quietly gets worse while its dashboard still looks green.
Credit, onboarding and account closures have real effects on people. Handing them to a model without safeguards creates data protection and fair-treatment risk.
What we build
Each job gets the simplest technique that works — rules where rules suffice, classic machine learning for scoring, language models for reading and drafting — with an evaluation set built from your own cases.
OCR and document models read passports, licences, bank statements, incorporation certificates and accounts, returning each field with a confidence level for analyst review.
Gradient-boosted and anomaly-detection models on payment, device and behaviour signals, working alongside your existing rules, with the top reasons listed next to every score.
Clean merchant names and assign categories to card and Open Banking transactions, so budgeting features, affordability reviews and reporting work from tidy data.
Retrieval over internal policies, product terms and procedures, so operations and compliance staff get cited answers instead of hunting through a wiki.
Chat and in-app assistants limited to approved answers on fees, limits and payments. Disputes, complaints and signs of vulnerability go straight to a person.
Agents that gather account history, screening hits and previous contact into one case file, then stop. The analyst reviews the file and makes the decision.
How we work
Our standard seven stages, with the work a financial firm needs inside them: labelled historical cases, a model record your risk team can review, and a person on every decision that affects a customer.
We pick one queue — fraud alerts, onboarding reviews, service contacts — and measure it: volumes, handling time, false-positive rate and how outcomes are labelled today.
A baseline from your own queue
We agree which technique fits, which data it may use and which decisions stay with people. Your risk and compliance teams see the plan before any build starts.
Agreed scope and decision boundary
Analyst screens that show the reasons behind each score or extracted field, override controls, and the data flows, retention and logging underneath.
Review screens and a data-flow map
Models trained and prompts written against a held-out set of your historical cases, with every change re-tested before it merges.
A pilot running on your own data
Accuracy and false-positive rates by segment, checks for unfair differences between customer groups, and tests of what happens when a provider or model is unavailable.
An evaluation pack for your risk team
Shadow mode first — the model scores live cases while analysts work as normal — then a staged switch-on with thresholds your team controls.
A controlled release with thresholds
Drift and performance monitoring, retraining on newly labelled outcomes, and threshold reviews with your team as fraud patterns and products change.
Monitoring and a retraining plan
Technology
Chosen per job for accuracy, explainability, cost and where your data may go — including UK cloud regions and open models in your own account.
Scoring models
Document AI
Language models
Retrieval
Data and pipelines
Controls
We are not tied to a model vendor. Model and API fees are paid to the provider and sit outside our rates; we estimate them before the build.
Use cases
Bounded tasks with a clear owner. In each one, the output goes to a person who decides.
Read incorporation certificates, shareholder registers and accounts, compare them with Companies House data and list discrepancies for the KYB analyst.
Score outgoing payments for signs of a scam — a new payee, an unusual amount, a rushed sequence — so staff can step in with a warning or a call before money leaves.
Lay out why a sanctions or PEP screening hit fired, with the matching and differing details side by side, for the analyst to clear or escalate.
Turn customer calls and chats into case notes, flag possible financial difficulty or vulnerability, and suggest next steps for the agent to confirm.
Extract income, regular outgoings and employer details from uploaded payslips and statements, with each figure linked to its source for the underwriter.
Check sampled calls, chats and emails against your conduct checklist and surface only the exceptions a compliance reviewer needs to read.
Why Techsleight
No inflated numbers — just how we run projects, and what you can hold us to.
We ask what the software is for before we estimate it — and we will tell you when something should not be built, or should be bought instead.
LLM features, retrieval and automation built with evaluation, guardrails and cost controls, and plain software where that is the better answer.
Design, frontend, backend, mobile, cloud and QA in one team, so nothing falls between suppliers.
UK business hours, estimates in pounds, and a contract with a UK company. Our engineers are based in the UK and India.
A fixed-scope project, dedicated developers or a monthly retainer — and you can move between them as the work changes.
Code, IP, cloud accounts and documentation are yours from day one. We sign an NDA before discovery if you need one.
We stay on for fixes, upgrades and new features, or hand over cleanly to your in-house team with the documentation to match.
FAQs
Straight answers on scope, cost, timelines and how we work. If yours is not here, ask us directly.
Usually not a large language model. Fraud scoring is usually better served by machine learning on structured signals — amounts, payees, devices, timings — using gradient-boosted trees or anomaly detection, combined with the rules your team already trusts. Language models help around the edges: summarising the case and drafting the note. We choose per job and explain why.
Each score is stored with its inputs and the factors that pushed it up or down, calculated with methods such as SHAP and shown in plain words on the review screen. That gives the analyst something to check, and gives your firm material to explain an outcome. Whether an explanation is adequate for a customer is for your compliance team to judge.
Often, yes, with the right approach: anomaly detection that learns normal behaviour, careful sampling, and labels collected from analyst outcomes as the system runs. We test on a later time period rather than random rows, so results reflect how the model will behave on future payments. If the data genuinely is not enough, we will say so in discovery.
We do not build it to. AI can read documents, extract income and outgoings and prepare the file, but the lending decision follows your credit policy and your underwriters. Solely automated decisions with significant effects on people are restricted under UK data protection law, and your DPO and compliance team decide what safeguards any automation needs.
We measure error rates and outcomes by segment — age band, region, product and other characteristics your firm is permitted to analyse — and look for proxies, such as postcode, that can stand in for protected characteristics. Differences are reported to your team with options to address them. Judging what is fair for your customers stays with your firm.
Techsleight Labs is based in London, with onshore and offshore engineers in the UK and India. Most model work can be done on redacted, tokenised or synthetic data, and any access to production data is limited to named people, time-boxed and logged. If your policies require UK-only access to certain data, tell us at the start and we will state plainly what we can and cannot provide.
To the provider you choose, under its business API terms, which we review with you during design — including data retention and whether a UK or European processing region is available. Personal data the model does not need is removed first. Where data must not leave your environment, we run open models in your own cloud account.
Monitoring tracks score distributions, alert volumes, analyst override rates and confirmed outcomes against the launch baseline. When the numbers drift, your team is alerted and we retrain or retune with the newly labelled cases. You see the same dashboard we do.
A discovery sprint to pick the queue, check the data and agree the decision boundary starts from £2,000. The pilot is then quoted as a fixed-price project. Model and API usage is paid to the provider and sits outside our rates; we estimate it from your volumes before you commit.
Start a project
Tell us which queue, roughly how many cases it handles and how outcomes are recorded today. We will tell you which technique fits, what data it needs and where a person should stay in the loop.
What happens next
Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy.
Explore