Nothing to beat
Without a baseline — last year’s figure, a moving average, the rule the team already uses — nobody can say whether the model adds anything or just adds cost.
Predictive analytics and machine learning
Forecasts, propensity and risk scores, and anomaly alerts built from the data you already hold — tested against a simple baseline on past periods, explained in terms people understand, and delivered into the tools where the next decision is made.
Why predictive projects disappoint
Most failed prediction projects had a model that scored well in a notebook. What they lacked was a fair comparison, honest data and a clear owner for what happens after the score appears.
Where prediction earns its keep
The best candidates are repeated decisions, made on data you already collect, where acting a little earlier or a little more precisely is worth money:
Without a baseline — last year’s figure, a moving average, the rule the team already uses — nobody can say whether the model adds anything or just adds cost.
Definitions changed, a system was migrated, or a field is only filled in after the outcome is known. Train on that and the model looks brilliant until it meets next month.
A risk score lands in a spreadsheet nobody opens. If it does not reach the person who can act, at the moment they can act, the prediction changes nothing.
Prices change, a new product launches, customers behave differently. Accuracy slips month by month, and without monitoring nobody notices until the numbers are clearly wrong.
What we build
Every model ships with the baseline it was compared against, a backtest on periods it never saw, the reasons behind its outputs and monitoring that tells you when it starts to drift.
Sales, orders, call volumes or cash, forecast by week, site or product with a range rather than a single number — so planners can see how uncertain next month really is.
The likelihood that each customer leaves, renews, buys again or responds to an offer, ranked so your team spends its time on the accounts where it matters most.
Scores that help prioritise claims, orders, applications or suppliers for checking. The model ranks and explains; a named person makes the decision.
Flags for transactions, sensor readings, expenses or stock movements that look unlike the normal pattern, tuned so alerts are rare enough that people still read them.
Pipelines that pull history from your systems, fix the known quirks and build the inputs a model needs — reusing your reporting database where one already exists.
Drift checks on inputs and outputs, accuracy tracked against what actually happened, and scheduled retraining with the old and new models compared before any switch.
How we work
The seven stages we use on every build, with the checks that matter for prediction: a decision to support, a baseline to beat, a backtest on unseen periods and monitoring once it is live.
We start with the decision, not the data: who acts on the prediction, how far ahead they need it, and what they would do differently. Then we look at what history exists to support it.
A decision, a horizon and an owner
We audit the data for gaps, changed definitions and fields that leak the answer, set a simple baseline, and agree the measure a model must beat to be worth running.
Data audit, baseline and success measure
We design how the output reaches people — a score in the CRM, a weekly forecast, an alert — with the top reasons beside it and a clear route to override it.
Where and how predictions are shown
Features and candidate models built in two-week sprints, from simple statistical methods up to gradient boosting, each one scored against the same baseline.
A shortlisted model with its evidence
A time-based backtest on periods the model never saw, checks on calibration and on performance for different customer groups, and a review of the cases it gets wrong.
A backtest report you can share
The model runs in shadow first, alongside the current way of working, so its predictions can be compared with real outcomes before anyone relies on them.
A monitored, shadow-tested release
Input and accuracy drift watched every week, retraining on a schedule or when drift is detected, and the model retired if a simpler method starts doing as well.
A model that stays honest over time
Technology
Mostly Python and well-established libraries. We choose the simplest method that beats the baseline, because it is cheaper to run and easier to explain.
Data and features
Modelling
Explainability
Serving
Data platforms
Operations
Not every question needs machine learning. If a moving average or a well-chosen rule does the job, we will show you the comparison and recommend the simpler option.
Use cases
Each one supports a decision someone already makes — earlier, with better evidence, and with a person still making the call.
Forecast demand by product and location, with ranges that account for promotions and seasonality, so buyers order with the uncertainty in view.
Rank accounts by risk of cancelling, with the usage and support signals behind each score, so customer success calls the right people first.
Score incoming claims for complexity or signs worth checking, so experienced handlers see the right files first. The model never declines a claim.
Predict parcel, order or call volumes by day and site, so shifts and vehicles are planned against a forecast rather than last year’s rota.
Flag payments, expenses or journal entries that do not fit the usual pattern, for a person to review before month-end rather than after it.
Watch sensor and machine data for readings that drift from normal, so maintenance can be planned before a fault stops the line.
Relevant work
Dental.AI is built around a custom computer vision model we trained on clinical images and retrain as new data arrives — the same discipline of evaluation and monitoring a forecasting model needs. Modernize is a revenue analytics platform — not an ML project — built on the kind of multi-source data pipeline that forecasting depends on.
All case studiesWhy Techsleight
No inflated numbers — just how we run projects, and what you can hold us to.
We ask what the software is for before we estimate it — and we will tell you when something should not be built, or should be bought instead.
LLM features, retrieval and automation built with evaluation, guardrails and cost controls, and plain software where that is the better answer.
Design, frontend, backend, mobile, cloud and QA in one team, so nothing falls between suppliers.
UK business hours, estimates in pounds, and a contract with a UK company. Our engineers are based in the UK and India.
A fixed-scope project, dedicated developers or a monthly retainer — and you can move between them as the work changes.
Code, IP, cloud accounts and documentation are yours from day one. We sign an NDA before discovery if you need one.
We stay on for fixes, upgrades and new features, or hand over cleanly to your in-house team with the documentation to match.
FAQs
Straight answers on scope, cost, timelines and how we work. If yours is not here, ask us directly.
Enough history to include the patterns you want predicted, several times over. For a weekly forecast with seasonality, that usually means a couple of years; for a churn model, enough past cancellations to learn from. Quality matters as much as volume, so the data audit comes before any estimate of what a model can do.
We compare it with a baseline — your current rule, last year’s figure or a simple average — on past periods the model never saw during training. If it does not beat the baseline by enough to justify the running cost, we say so and recommend the simpler option.
Nobody can say honestly before looking at your data. What we can do is measure it: the backtest shows how the model would have performed on real past periods, and forecasts come with ranges rather than a single number. We never present a prediction as more certain than it is.
Yes. Each score comes with its main contributing factors — for example a drop in usage or a run of support tickets — so the person acting on it can judge whether it makes sense. Where a decision has to be explainable to a customer or regulator, we choose models that make that practical.
Drift is when the world changes and the patterns a model learned stop holding — new products, new prices, different customer behaviour. We monitor the model’s inputs and its accuracy against real outcomes, retrain on a schedule or when drift appears, and compare the new model with the old one before switching.
Whichever beats the baseline at the lowest running cost. For many forecasts a well-tuned statistical method is hard to beat; machine learning helps when many factors interact, such as churn or claims scoring. We try both and show you the comparison rather than defaulting to the more complex option.
Only as input to a person’s decision. Our models rank and explain; a named person decides on credit, claims, pricing or anything affecting an individual. Where personal data is involved, UK GDPR rules on automated decision-making may apply, and we give your DPO the technical detail they need to assess it.
Business intelligence tells you what has happened, from agreed numbers. Predictive analytics estimates what is likely to happen next, with a measured level of uncertainty. They share the same data foundations, and our business intelligence service covers the reporting side in detail.
It starts with a discovery sprint, from £2,000, covering the decision, the data audit and a baseline. The build is then quoted as a fixed-price project. Running costs — cloud compute and any data platform — are usually modest for batch scoring, and we estimate them before you commit.
We can keep monitoring and retraining it on a support retainer, or hand it to your team with the training code, data pipeline, backtest reports and a runbook explaining how to retrain, compare and roll back a model.
Start a project
Tell us the decision and the data behind it. We will give you an honest view on whether a model can beat what you do now, and how we would test that before you build anything.
What happens next
Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy.
Explore