Due diligence that stalls
The outsourcing questionnaire comes back half-answered: nobody can say who has production access, where data is processed or what happens on exit.
Fintech software development · UK
We build software for UK fintechs and financial services firms with the delivery habits regulated work needs — audit trails, controlled releases, separated environments — and plain answers when your compliance team assesses us as a supplier.
Choosing a fintech supplier
The code is rarely what fails the review. It is the supplier’s access controls, change history, data handling or exit terms — found out when your compliance team or a partner bank starts asking questions.
What a fintech supplier should give you
The outsourcing questionnaire comes back half-answered: nobody can say who has production access, where data is processed or what happens on exit.
Production credentials passed around a chat group, and people who left the project months ago still able to reach live systems.
Changes go live straight from a developer’s machine, with no review, no test record and no named approver when something goes wrong.
Copies of live customer records in development environments and on laptops — an avoidable UK GDPR problem, and a hard one to explain.
The supplier holds the cloud account, the repository or the only copy of the documentation, so your exit plan exists only on paper.
A supplier tells you a design is “compliant”. That is your compliance function’s call, and a supplier who blurs the line adds risk rather than removing it.
Who it is for
The firms differ in size and permissions, but share one need: software delivered in a way their compliance team can oversee.
Products built on a bank or e-money partner’s platform, where the partner’s technical and security requirements shape the build as much as your own.
New customer journeys, integrations and operational tooling for authorised firms that need change delivered under control.
Application journeys, decision workflows and customer servicing portals, with every decision and override recorded.
Onboarding, information capture, statements and client reporting for firms whose customers expect clarity.
Legacy tools and spreadsheets replaced step by step, with change control strong enough for internal audit.
Suppliers whose own customers are regulated — and who need their software, and their delivery, to survive a bank’s vendor review.
How we deliver
Regulated firms do not just need working software; they need to show how it came to be, who approved it and who can touch it. So we make the evidence a by-product of the way we work, rather than a document written the week before an audit.
Every change starts as a ticket, goes through a pull request reviewed by a second engineer, runs automated tests and reaches production only through the deployment pipeline — as a release you approve, with a rollback plan. Development, staging and production are separate environments with separate credentials; live customer data stays in production, and testing uses masked or synthetic data. Access to production is limited to named people, logged, and reviewed with you.
Inside the application, audit trails are part of the data model: who viewed or changed a customer record, who approved a payment or overrode a check, and when. Those records are what let you answer a complaint, an auditor or a partner bank with facts rather than recollection.
Supplier due diligence
If your firm is regulated by the FCA, bringing in a software supplier is a third-party risk decision — and if the software supports one of your important business services, it touches your operational resilience work as well. Your firm stays responsible for the outcome, so your compliance team will want to understand who we are, how we work and how you would leave.
Tell us at the start what your policy requires from a supplier, and we will go through it with you and say plainly what we can provide and what we cannot — before either side spends time on a proposal. Our engineers are based in the UK and India, so expect your DPO to ask who can reach which environment, from where, and how any international transfer of personal data would be covered; those questions need answers before anyone is given access.
Exit planning is the easy part: you own the code, cloud accounts and documentation from day one, so leaving us is a handover, not a negotiation. What we will not do is tell you the arrangement meets your regulatory obligations. That judgement belongs to your compliance function; our job is to give them accurate information to make it.
Clear responsibilities
A lot of trouble in fintech projects starts with blurred responsibilities. We agree this split in writing at the start, so nobody assumes someone else has it covered.
Holds the permissions, sets policy and risk appetite, decides whether the product meets your regulatory obligations, and approves each release.
Banking, e-money, Open Banking, card and identity partners provide the regulated services under their own permissions, through their APIs and terms.
Designs, builds, tests and documents the software — onboarding with KYC and KYB checks, Open Banking and payment integrations, back-office tools — to your requirements, and evidences how it was done.
Penetration testers, internal audit and external auditors check the work independently. We prepare environments, answer their questions and fix what they find.
How we work
Our usual seven stages, with the control points a regulated firm needs made explicit — and your compliance team involved where their input changes the design.
Users, products and money flows mapped alongside the regulatory touchpoints: which providers hold which permissions, what data is processed, and who in your firm signs off what.
Scope, data map and sign-off owners
Supplier due diligence runs in parallel with scoping, and we agree the controls — environments, access, audit logging, release approval — before quoting the build.
Agreed controls and fixed quote
Your compliance team reviews prototypes and customer-facing wording before build, and journeys are instrumented with the events your Consumer Duty outcome monitoring needs.
Reviewed journeys and event plan
Two-week sprints in which every change is ticketed, peer-reviewed and deployed through the pipeline, with a demo to you at the end of each sprint.
Traceable changes every sprint
Automated tests on money movement and permissions, duplicate and out-of-order events, and user acceptance testing in staging with your sign-off recorded.
Test evidence and UAT sign-off
Production deployment with monitoring, backups and a rollback plan, followed by a handover of code, credentials and documentation.
A live, documented product
Incidents handled to an agreed process, dependencies and security patches kept current, and production access reviewed with you on a set rhythm.
Support with an audit trail
Typical timeline
An example for a new customer-facing product built on a regulated partner’s APIs. The assurance steps run alongside the build, not after it.
An illustration, not a promise. Partner onboarding, due diligence and independent testing each have their own timelines, which often set the launch date more than the build does. You get a dated plan after discovery.
Journeys, money flows and data mapped; your supplier review started in parallel; controls, environments and sign-off owners agreed.
Scope, controls and fixed quote
Customer journeys prototyped and reviewed by compliance, and the partner’s sandbox APIs integrated to prove the riskiest flows early.
Reviewed prototype, working sandbox
Two-week sprints, every change ticketed, reviewed and tested, with a demo to you at the end of each sprint.
Traceable, working software
Penetration testing by an independent firm where you or your partner require it, findings fixed, and user acceptance testing signed off in staging.
Test evidence and sign-offs
A release you approve, limits and monitoring in place, then access reviews, patching and incident handling on an agreed rhythm.
Live product with an audit trail
Engagement models
Fintech work starts with a discovery sprint, where scope, controls and supplier due diligence are settled together. The build is then a fixed-price project, or a managed team for a longer roadmap.
From £2,000 fixed fee
You have an idea or a problem, but not yet a scope you would trust a quote against.
Quoted after discovery
A defined build — an MVP, a rebuild or a feature set — with milestones and a fixed budget.
From £9,500 per month
A small cross-functional pod — engineering, QA and delivery lead — that owns an outcome.
Prices are in GBP. Every estimate is confirmed in writing after a discovery call — the figures above are where engagements start, not a quote.
Relevant work
Payments, banking and wallet apps. Each case study covers the brief, the approach and the stack.
All case studiesMobile-first money transfer and card app for a cross-border fintech.
Digital banking app: accounts, bill payments, loans and investments.
Multi-bank digital wallet with transfers, analytics and virtual cards.
Why Techsleight
Plain answers to the questions supplier due diligence usually asks.
Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy, a UK company registered at 128 City Road, London EC1V 2NX. Your contract is with that company.
By engineers based in the UK and India, on UK business hours, with production access limited to a named few.
Through reviewed pull requests, automated tests, staging and a release you approve — the same route, faster, for urgent fixes.
Ticket-to-release traceability, test results, release notes and access reviews, kept as a by-product of how we work.
Encryption in transit and at rest, secrets kept out of code, masked data outside production, and access removed when people leave the project.
You already own the code, cloud accounts and documentation, so an exit plan is a handover checklist rather than a negotiation.
Give legal or regulatory advice, or tell you a design meets FCA rules. Your compliance function decides; we build and evidence what they specify.
FAQs
Straight answers on scope, cost, timelines and how we work. If yours is not here, ask us directly.
Tell us what your policy requires at the start. We will go through it with you and say plainly what we can provide and what we cannot, before you commit to anything. What never needs negotiating is ownership: the code, cloud accounts and documentation are yours from day one.
Access is limited to named people you have agreed, granted per person rather than through shared logins, logged, and reviewed with you on a set rhythm. People lose access when they leave the project. Most engineering work needs no production access at all, which is how we prefer it.
Every change is ticketed, reviewed by a second engineer, tested automatically and deployed through the pipeline to staging. You approve the release to production, and the approver is recorded against it. Urgent fixes follow the same route, just faster — never around it.
No. We develop and test with synthetic or masked data, and live customer data stays in production. When investigating a production issue genuinely requires looking at live records, it happens under access you have approved, and it is logged.
Our engineers are based in the UK and India and work UK business hours. Your platform and data sit in your own cloud accounts — typically AWS’s London region for UK firms — and we document any access from outside the UK so your DPO can assess how it is covered.
They stay with you, because they were always yours: code, cloud accounts, documentation and credentials. We hand over a walkthrough of how everything is built, deployed and monitored, remove our own access, and confirm when that is done.
Yes. Banking and e-money partners usually set requirements for security, data handling, testing and change notification, and may review how their programme partners work. We build to those requirements and join technical calls with the partner when that helps; if a requirement is something we cannot meet, we tell you early.
Yes. Regulated firms and their partners often expect an independent test before launch and after major changes. We prepare a suitable environment, answer the testers’ questions, fix the findings and support the retest. We can run our own security testing too, but that would not count as independent.
A discovery sprint starts from £2,000 and settles scope and controls; the build is then quoted as a fixed price with milestone billing. Longer roadmaps suit a managed team, from £9,500 a month. Documentation and control work appears as its own line in the quote, so you can see what it costs.
The build is usually not the longest step. Partner onboarding, due diligence, independent testing and your own approvals each have their own timelines, so we plan them alongside the build from the first week. You get a dated plan after discovery that shows both tracks.
Start a project
Tell us what you are building, which regulated providers are involved and what your compliance team will need from a supplier. We will reply with questions, a first view on approach and what discovery would cover.
What happens next
Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy.
Explore