Keys and calls in every service
Each team wires up its own provider client, with its own retries, timeouts and secrets. Rotating a key or changing a model means hunting through every repository.
LLM integration
Language models added to the software you already run — your codebase, your authentication, your data stores, your deployment pipeline. We put GPT, Claude, Gemini or open models behind a single gateway your services call, so prompts are versioned, spend is visible, providers can be swapped, and fine-tuning happens only when the numbers justify it.
Why integrations get messy
The first model call usually goes straight into a controller. By the third feature there are API keys in several services, prompts pasted into string literals, no shared logging, and nobody can say what the whole thing costs.
What a clean integration gives you
Treat the model as one more dependency, behind an interface your own code controls:
Each team wires up its own provider client, with its own retries, timeouts and secrets. Rotating a key or changing a model means hunting through every repository.
Instructions live in code strings and admin panels. When output changes, there is no record of which prompt version or model produced it, so problems cannot be reproduced.
Code written against one vendor’s SDK and response format makes a price rise, an outage or a better model elsewhere expensive to act on.
Usage arrives as one invoice with no split by feature or customer. Finance sees the total rise and engineering cannot say which release caused it.
Integration work
Most of the work is ordinary software engineering around the model call — the parts that decide whether your own team can maintain it once we step back.
Shortlisted models compared on your own examples for quality, speed, cost and data terms, with the result written up so the choice can be revisited later.
A thin internal service or library every feature calls: provider adapters, authentication, rate limits, retries, timeouts, fallbacks and logging in one place.
Prompts stored as versioned templates with tests, released through your pipeline, and every response tagged with the prompt and model that produced it.
Test sets drawn from real traffic and scored automatically in CI, so a prompt edit or model upgrade is judged on evidence rather than a spot check.
Llama, Mistral or other open models deployed in your AWS, Azure or Google Cloud account — in a UK region if required — behind the same gateway as hosted models.
Training data preparation, tuning runs and a side-by-side comparison with the untuned model, recommended only where prompting and retrieval leave a measured gap.
How we work
The standard seven stages, adapted for adding a dependency to software that is already in production: small changes, behind flags, with a way back.
We read the relevant code, trace where model calls already exist or will sit, and gather real inputs and expected outputs for the features in scope.
An integration map and first test set
Gateway design, provider shortlist, hosted or self-hosted route, and a per-feature budget for latency and cost, each recorded as a decision your engineers can review.
Architecture decisions and a quote
Where model output reaches users, we design streaming, loading and failure states, and decide what the product does when a model is slow or unavailable.
Fallback behaviour users can live with
Two-week sprints in your repositories, following your conventions and code review. Existing model calls move behind the gateway one at a time.
Features running through the gateway
Evaluation runs on every pull request, failure drills for provider timeouts and outages, and load tests against the agreed latency budget.
An evaluation and resilience report
Traffic shifted gradually behind feature flags, with spend, latency and error rates per feature on a dashboard before the rollout widens.
A gradual, reversible cut-over
When a provider changes prices or releases a new model, we run your evaluation set against it and switch by configuration if it wins.
Provider switches tested before rollout
Technology
We work in the languages and platforms you already use, and keep provider-specific code at the edges so it can be replaced without touching features.
Hosted providers
Open model serving
Gateway
Your languages
Fine-tuning
Observability
Provider features, prices and model versions change often. We check current terms and availability for your shortlist during design, rather than relying on what was true a few months ago.
Use cases
Most engagements start with software that already exists and a model that needs to fit into it properly.
Move model calls from several services behind one gateway, with shared logging, limits and a single view of spend.
Test an alternative model on your evaluation set and move traffic across by configuration, keeping the old provider as a fallback.
Run an open model in your own cloud account so sensitive data never goes to a third-party API, behind the interface your features already call.
Replace a large general model on a narrow, repetitive task with a smaller tuned one, where tests show it matches quality at lower cost and latency.
Build a test set from production traffic for a feature that shipped without one, so future prompt and model changes stop being guesswork.
Expose model features to older .NET, Java or PHP applications through a clean internal API, without rewriting the application around them.
Why Techsleight
No inflated numbers — just how we run projects, and what you can hold us to.
We ask what the software is for before we estimate it — and we will tell you when something should not be built, or should be bought instead.
LLM features, retrieval and automation built with evaluation, guardrails and cost controls, and plain software where that is the better answer.
Design, frontend, backend, mobile, cloud and QA in one team, so nothing falls between suppliers.
UK business hours, estimates in pounds, and a contract with a UK company. Our engineers are based in the UK and India.
A fixed-scope project, dedicated developers or a monthly retainer — and you can move between them as the work changes.
Code, IP, cloud accounts and documentation are yours from day one. We sign an NDA before discovery if you need one.
We stay on for fixes, upgrades and new features, or hand over cleanly to your in-house team with the documentation to match.
FAQs
Straight answers on scope, cost, timelines and how we work. If yours is not here, ask us directly.
For one experimental feature, calling the provider directly is fine. Once two or more features or services use models, a thin gateway pays for itself: one place for keys, retries, fallbacks, logging and cost tracking, and the freedom to change provider without touching feature code. It can be a small shared library rather than a new service.
Harder than it looks when code depends on one provider’s SDK and response shapes, and prompts have been tuned to one model. Behind a gateway with an evaluation set, it becomes a test run: point the gateway at the new model, compare quality, cost and latency, adjust prompts where scores drop, and shift traffic gradually.
Collecting and cleaning a set of examples of the exact input and output you want — typically hundreds to thousands — running tuning jobs, and comparing the tuned model with both the base model and a well-prompted larger one on held-out test data. The work has to be repeated when the base model is retired, so we include that maintenance in the estimate.
Yes. Open models such as Llama or Mistral can be tuned with lightweight adapter methods and served from GPU instances in your own cloud account, including in a UK region. You own the weights and the infrastructure; the trade-off is that you also run it, so we set up monitoring and scaling and document how to operate it.
Model calls take longer than most API calls, so we keep them off the critical path where we can: streaming for user-facing text, background jobs for bulk work, caching for repeated requests, timeouts with sensible fallbacks, and smaller models for simple steps. Each feature gets a latency budget that is tested before launch.
Yes. The gateway tags each request with the feature and customer or tenant, and records the model, tokens and price. That feeds a dashboard and alerts, so you can see cost per task, set limits per customer, and reflect usage in your own pricing if you want to.
Providers publish deprecation schedules, and pinned model versions do eventually stop working. With a gateway and an evaluation set, the replacement is tested well in advance, prompts are adjusted where scores drop, and traffic moves before the deadline rather than on it.
Usually in your codebase, following your conventions, code review and CI, so your engineers own the result. Where a separate service is the cleaner design — a gateway shared by several teams, for example — we build it in your cloud account and document it for handover.
A discovery sprint from £2,000 maps the integration and ends in a fixed quote for the build. Ongoing work can be a dedicated developer from £2,900 a month or flexible hours from £20 an hour. Model and API usage, and GPU hosting for self-hosted models, are separate costs paid directly to the provider.
Onshore and offshore engineers who work in Python, TypeScript, C#/.NET and Java, collaborating remotely on UK business hours through a shared channel, weekly written updates and fortnightly demos. For choosing a UK LLM partner more broadly, see our LLM development in the UK page.
Start a project
Tell us about your stack, the features that use or will use a model, and what is not working today. An engineer will reply with questions and a suggested first step.
What happens next
Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy.
Explore