LLM integration

LLM Integration and Fine-Tuning for Your Existing Stack

Language models added to the software you already run — your codebase, your authentication, your data stores, your deployment pipeline. We put GPT, Claude, Gemini or open models behind a single gateway your services call, so prompts are versioned, spend is visible, providers can be swapped, and fine-tuning happens only when the numbers justify it.

  • One gateway in front of every model
  • Swap providers without rewriting features
  • Fine-tuning only after a measured gap

Why integrations get messy

The second LLM feature is where it goes wrong.

The first model call usually goes straight into a controller. By the third feature there are API keys in several services, prompts pasted into string literals, no shared logging, and nobody can say what the whole thing costs.

What a clean integration gives you

Treat the model as one more dependency, behind an interface your own code controls:

  • One place for keys, limits, retries and fallbacks
  • Prompts versioned and released like code
  • Cost and latency visible per feature and per customer
  • A provider change as a configuration and test run, not a rewrite
  • Open models in your own cloud when data must stay put

Keys and calls in every service

Each team wires up its own provider client, with its own retries, timeouts and secrets. Rotating a key or changing a model means hunting through every repository.

Prompts nobody can trace

Instructions live in code strings and admin panels. When output changes, there is no record of which prompt version or model produced it, so problems cannot be reproduced.

Tied to one provider

Code written against one vendor’s SDK and response format makes a price rise, an outage or a better model elsewhere expensive to act on.

Spend with no owner

Usage arrives as one invoice with no split by feature or customer. Finance sees the total rise and engineering cannot say which release caused it.

How we work

How we integrate models into live systems.

The standard seven stages, adapted for adding a dependency to software that is already in production: small changes, behind flags, with a way back.

  1. 01

    Discovery

    We read the relevant code, trace where model calls already exist or will sit, and gather real inputs and expected outputs for the features in scope.

    An integration map and first test set

  2. 02

    Strategy

    Gateway design, provider shortlist, hosted or self-hosted route, and a per-feature budget for latency and cost, each recorded as a decision your engineers can review.

    Architecture decisions and a quote

  3. 03

    UX & architecture

    Where model output reaches users, we design streaming, loading and failure states, and decide what the product does when a model is slow or unavailable.

    Fallback behaviour users can live with

  4. 04

    Development

    Two-week sprints in your repositories, following your conventions and code review. Existing model calls move behind the gateway one at a time.

    Features running through the gateway

  5. 05

    Testing

    Evaluation runs on every pull request, failure drills for provider timeouts and outages, and load tests against the agreed latency budget.

    An evaluation and resilience report

  6. 06

    Launch

    Traffic shifted gradually behind feature flags, with spend, latency and error rates per feature on a dashboard before the rollout widens.

    A gradual, reversible cut-over

  7. 07

    Optimisation & support

    When a provider changes prices or releases a new model, we run your evaluation set against it and switch by configuration if it wins.

    Provider switches tested before rollout

Technology

Providers, runtimes and plumbing.

We work in the languages and platforms you already use, and keep provider-specific code at the edges so it can be replaced without touching features.

Hosted providers

OpenAIAnthropic ClaudeGoogle GeminiCloud model platforms

Open model serving

Llama and MistralvLLM and similar serversGPU instances in your cloudQuantised models for smaller hardware

Gateway

Provider adaptersRate limits and retriesFallback routingSecrets management

Your languages

PythonTypeScript and Node.jsC# and .NETJava and Go

Fine-tuning

Hosted fine-tuning APIsLoRA adapters on open modelsTraining data preparationTuned versus base comparisons

Observability

Request tracingToken and cost meteringEvaluation runs in CILatency and error dashboards

Provider features, prices and model versions change often. We check current terms and availability for your shortlist during design, rather than relying on what was true a few months ago.

Use cases

Integration jobs we are asked to do.

Most engagements start with software that already exists and a model that needs to fit into it properly.

SaaS platforms

Consolidating scattered model calls

Move model calls from several services behind one gateway, with shared logging, limits and a single view of spend.

Product teams

Switching or adding a provider

Test an alternative model on your evaluation set and move traffic across by configuration, keeping the old provider as a fallback.

Regulated businesses

Self-hosting an open model

Run an open model in your own cloud account so sensitive data never goes to a third-party API, behind the interface your features already call.

High-volume workloads

Tuning a small classifier

Replace a large general model on a narrow, repetitive task with a smaller tuned one, where tests show it matches quality at lower cost and latency.

Engineering teams

Evals for a feature already live

Build a test set from production traffic for a feature that shipped without one, so future prompt and model changes stop being guesswork.

Older systems

Model features for legacy apps

Expose model features to older .NET, Java or PHP applications through a clean internal API, without rewriting the application around them.

Why Techsleight

What working with us is actually like.

No inflated numbers — just how we run projects, and what you can hold us to.

Product engineering, not ticket-taking

We ask what the software is for before we estimate it — and we will tell you when something should not be built, or should be bought instead.

AI where it earns its place

LLM features, retrieval and automation built with evaluation, guardrails and cost controls, and plain software where that is the better answer.

Full-stack under one roof

Design, frontend, backend, mobile, cloud and QA in one team, so nothing falls between suppliers.

UK-focused delivery

UK business hours, estimates in pounds, and a contract with a UK company. Our engineers are based in the UK and India.

Flexible engagement

A fixed-scope project, dedicated developers or a monthly retainer — and you can move between them as the work changes.

You own everything

Code, IP, cloud accounts and documentation are yours from day one. We sign an NDA before discovery if you need one.

Support after launch

We stay on for fixes, upgrades and new features, or hand over cleanly to your in-house team with the documentation to match.

FAQs

Questions we get asked.

Straight answers on scope, cost, timelines and how we work. If yours is not here, ask us directly.

Ask us a question

Should we call the model provider directly or build a gateway?

For one experimental feature, calling the provider directly is fine. Once two or more features or services use models, a thin gateway pays for itself: one place for keys, retries, fallbacks, logging and cost tracking, and the freedom to change provider without touching feature code. It can be a small shared library rather than a new service.

How hard is it to move from one LLM provider to another?

Harder than it looks when code depends on one provider’s SDK and response shapes, and prompts have been tuned to one model. Behind a gateway with an evaluation set, it becomes a test run: point the gateway at the new model, compare quality, cost and latency, adjust prompts where scores drop, and shift traffic gradually.

What does a fine-tuning project actually involve?

Collecting and cleaning a set of examples of the exact input and output you want — typically hundreds to thousands — running tuning jobs, and comparing the tuned model with both the base model and a well-prompted larger one on held-out test data. The work has to be repeated when the base model is retired, so we include that maintenance in the estimate.

Can you fine-tune an open model and host it for us?

Yes. Open models such as Llama or Mistral can be tuned with lightweight adapter methods and served from GPU instances in your own cloud account, including in a UK region. You own the weights and the infrastructure; the trade-off is that you also run it, so we set up monitoring and scaling and document how to operate it.

Will integrating an LLM slow our application down?

Model calls take longer than most API calls, so we keep them off the critical path where we can: streaming for user-facing text, background jobs for bulk work, caching for repeated requests, timeouts with sensible fallbacks, and smaller models for simple steps. Each feature gets a latency budget that is tested before launch.

Can you track LLM spend per feature or per customer?

Yes. The gateway tags each request with the feature and customer or tenant, and records the model, tokens and price. That feeds a dashboard and alerts, so you can see cost per task, set limits per customer, and reflect usage in your own pricing if you want to.

What happens when a provider retires the model we use?

Providers publish deprecation schedules, and pinned model versions do eventually stop working. With a gateway and an evaluation set, the replacement is tested well in advance, prompts are adjusted where scores drop, and traffic moves before the deadline rather than on it.

Do you work in our codebase or deliver a separate service?

Usually in your codebase, following your conventions, code review and CI, so your engineers own the result. Where a separate service is the cleaner design — a gateway shared by several teams, for example — we build it in your cloud account and document it for handover.

What does LLM integration cost?

A discovery sprint from £2,000 maps the integration and ends in a fixed quote for the build. Ongoing work can be a dedicated developer from £2,900 a month or flexible hours from £20 an hour. Model and API usage, and GPU hosting for self-hosted models, are separate costs paid directly to the provider.

Who carries out the integration work?

Onshore and offshore engineers who work in Python, TypeScript, C#/.NET and Java, collaborating remotely on UK business hours through a shared channel, weekly written updates and fortnightly demos. For choosing a UK LLM partner more broadly, see our LLM development in the UK page.

Start a project

Adding models to an existing product?

Tell us about your stack, the features that use or will use a model, and what is not working today. An engineer will reply with questions and a suggested first step.

  1. 1A senior engineer reads your brief within one working day, and replies with questions or a first view.
  2. 2A 30-minute call to understand the goal, constraints and what good looks like — no sales script.
  3. 3A written proposal with scope, milestones, team and a GBP estimate you can take to your board.

Techsleight Labs is a trading name of Krapton IT Consultancy.

Reply within one working day. NDA on request. Your details are used only to respond — privacy policy.